State Aid – Financing of Promotional Activities by Trade Chambers

Dutch law provides for the establishment of industry associations and entrusts to them a certain scope of internal autonomy. The case concerns a Dutch chamber of traders active on the market of optic products which, by virtue of its internal bye-laws, imposed specific charges on its members. These charges were used solely to finance advertising activity designed to promote optical products for the benefit of the Chamber’ members.
The dispute arose between the chamber and three of its members, private corporations active in the optic industry, which contested the levy of the charge by the chamber. The plaintiffs argued that the charge qualified as state aid within the meaning of applicable Community law. Since the alleged state aid had not been notified to the Commission, as is normally required under Community law, the plaintiff argued that the decision of the chamber to levy the charge was invalid and that the charges already collected were subject to reimbursement.
The Court has ruled in favour of the Chamber. It noted that state aid is defined as any support granted directly or indirectly from public funds, which may be attributed to the activity of public authorities.
That definition does not seem, in the Court’s opinion, to cover the charge collected by the chamber. The revenues so acquired were used only in the interest of the members, which benefited from the promotional activities. Thus, the benefits enjoyed by the members were not related to any allocation or transfer of public funds since any advantages which the members might have obtained were financed by means of the charge collected from them.
The Court also set aside, as irrelevant to this case, the argument that both the activities and authority of the Chamber, including the right to impose charges, were based on the provisions of Dutch public laws on entrepreneurship. The Court also pointed out that the decision of the chamber to impose the charge was taken at the request of some of its members. As such, the charge was not a part of the general policy of the Dutch public authorities and could not have been attributed to them.
Other articles
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.
30th Advent Concert for the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation
This year again, during the pre-Christmas season, the Advent Concert of Good Will took place. Since 1995, it has been organised by the law firm Kocián Šolc Balaštík in support of the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation. This was already the 30th anniversary edition, made exceptional by the fact that we organised it for the first time together with our partner, Smetanova Litomyšl, as part of a broader mutual cooperation. As always, the concert was held in the concert hall of the Church of Sts. Simon and Jude in Prague’s Old Town.
30th Advent Concert for the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation
The Advent Concert of Good Will, organised since 1995 by the law firm Kocián Šolc Balaštík for the benefit of the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation, will this year take place on Sunday, 7 December, from 7:00 p.m., traditionally in the concert hall of the Church of Sts. Simon and Jude in the Old Town of Prague. The concert is held under the auspices of the First Lady of the Czech Republic, Mrs Eva Pavlová.