5.8.2008
News

Return of unjustly collected tax

Resolution of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) No. C‑309/06, Marks & Spencer plc of 10 April 2008. The ECJ gave a ruling in response to an application for a resolution on a preliminary issue that was filed within the context of a dispute between Marks & Spencer plc and the Commissioners of Customs & Excise wherein Marks & Spencer applied for return of value added tax unjustly collected by the Commissioner. The ECJ’s resolution interprets Article 28, paragraph 2 of the Sixth Directive (Directive of the Council No. 77/388/EHS on harmonization of legal regulations of EU member states concerning turnover tax).

The ECJ stated, inter alia, the following: If a certain performance taxed at the basic rate should have been tax exempt pursuant to domestic law and tax is therefore overpaid, the general principles of Community law shall be applied, including the principle of tax neutrality, so that the economic entity which realized this performance is granted the right to refund of the amounts incorrectly demanded for said performance.

Even if the principles of equal treatment and tax neutrality are applied to the matter of the original proceedings, they are not infringed simply because rejection of returning the tax is based on unjustified enrichment of the relevant person obliged to pay the tax. On the contrary, the principle of tax neutrality prevents the prohibition of unjustified enrichment to be objected only vis-à-vis persons obliged to pay the tax such as payment traders (persons obliged to pay the tax whose collected output tax in the relevant accounting period is higher than the paid input tax) and not vis-à-vis persons obliged to pay the tax such as repayment traders (persons obliged to pay the tax whose situation is contrary to that of the above persons) if such persons obliged to pay the tax bring comparable products to the market. The domestic court is competent to verify this fact in the matter under consideration. In addition, the general principle of equal treatment, the infringement of which may be represented by discrimination affecting economic entities which are not necessarily competitors but in a comparable situation in other relations, prevents discrimination between payment traders and repayment traders that is not objectively justified.

The ECJ’s resolution must be interpreted as follows: if an economic entity pays a tax higher than the correct amount, they must be allowed to correct the tax and be refunded the incorrectly paid tax. In this sense, the Czech VAT Act currently does not fulfill the conditions of tax neutrality but the amendment to the VAT Act, approved by the Senate in July and awaiting the president’s signature and publication in the Collection of Law, at least eliminates the previous impossibility to correct incorrectly charged higher tax rates. As of 1 January 2009, tax charged incorrectly may be corrected pursuant to the Czech Vat Act and the ECJ’s resolution.

Other articles

5.8.2025
News

Legal Advisory to Japanese Group Ushio on the Acquisition of a Division of ams-OSRAM

The KŠB team, led by partner Dagmar Dubecká and attorney Jana Guričová, provided legal advisory to Japanese company Ushio Inc., a global leader in semiconductor technologies and specialized lighting for the automotive and industrial sectors, in connection with its acquisition of the Entertainment& Industrial Lamps segment from the Austrian-based ams-OSRAM Group, a company with over a century of history.
28.7.2025
News

Smetanova Litomyšl Comes to a Close with Music and a Message of Solidarity

This year’s edition of the Smetanova Litomyšl festival concluded with the concert Grand Finale – An American Story, held under the patronage of our firm. In addition to delivering a remarkable musical experience, the evening also served a charitable purpose: proceeds supported the Olga Havel Foundation (Výbor dobré vůle – Nadace Olgy Havlové), helping young people from disadvantaged backgrounds pursue their education.
8.7.2025
News

Advising J&T on the preparation of another bond programme – the Europacity Berlin project.

KŠB provided legal advice to its long-standing client, the J&T group, in connection with the preparation of another bond programme, this time related to the Europacity Berlin project. The base prospectus has already been approved by the Czech National Bank, and the first final terms have been prepared for an issue in the amount of CZK 3 billion. The advisory team at KŠB included Josef Kříž, under the partner supervision of Martin Krejčí. Vlastimil Pihera.