Consumer Protection, Advertising, Competition

Act No. 634/1992 Coll., the Consumer Protection Act, as amended
The newly formulated provisions of Section 4 include a general prohibition of unfair business practice; this prohibition applies to all entities operating on an internal market, including financial services providers, insurance providers, etc. At the same time, this Act must be applied not only to the very sale of goods or services but also to the offering thereof, including advertising; the amendment to the provisions of Section 1, subsection 3 substantially increased the powers of the entire Act. Any entrepreneur’s conduct toward a consumer in conflict with the requirements of due professional care and capable of substantially influencing the consumer’s decision-making so that the consumer makes a decision that they otherwise would not make is generally deemed to constitute unfair practice. The average consumer is, for the purpose of the quoted Directive, a consumer who is reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect; however, if consumers whose characteristics make them particularly vulnerable to unfair commercial practices are involved, such as children, it is desirable that the impact of the commercial practice be assessed from the perspective of the average member of that group. In addition to the general definition of unfair commercial practices, the provisions of Sections 5 and 5a define the major forms - misleading commercial practices and aggressive commercial practices. The schedules to the Act contain a list of forms of commercial behaviour that are at all times deemed to constitute misleading or aggressive commercial practices. The Act also newly includes administrative delinquencies in this area; the top penalty rates are more differentiated (mostly reduced as compared to the former prevailing rate of up to CZK 50 million) depending on the severity of the delinquency committed.
Act No. 40/1995 Coll., concerning advertising regulation and amending Act No. 468/1991 Coll., concerning operation of radio and television broadcasting, as amended
The former term “misleading advertising” has been replaced by a more general one: “advertising that constitutes unfair commercial practice”. As a result of this, the assessment whether advertising is misleading or not is subject to the criteria defined in the Consumer Protection Act. The former legislation was made stricter in terms of the periods prescribed for archiving advertising samples – it was extended from 12 months to 5 years following the last distribution (Section 7a, subsection 1).
Commercial Code
This is a detailed addition to the terms and conditions for admissibility of comparable advertising in connection with, inter alia, misleading commercial practices in the provisions of Section 50a, subsection 2.
Other articles
KSB Presents Key Digital Obligations for 2026 at Business Breakfast in Ostrava
On 24 September 2026, Kocián Šolc Baláštík (KSB), in cooperation with the Regional Chamber of Commerce of the Moravian-Silesian Region, hosted a business breakfast under the title "Digital Obligations 2026: Cybersecurity, E-commerce and Accessibility Under the Microscope". The event was held at Futureum in the Dolní Vítkovice area of Ostrava.
KŠB advises J&T Banka, Unicredit, PPF Banka, Česká spořitelna and Komerční banka on the next phase of EMMA Capital's bond programme
KŠB is continuing its previous legal advisory work for J&T, Unicredit and Česká spořitelna on the bond programme of the investment group EMMA Capital, which is recording strong investor interest on the market again in the second half of the year.
KŠB secures landmark Supreme Court ruling on size premiums in squeeze-out valuations
Kocián Šolc Balaštík (KŠB) has obtained a significant victory before the Czech Supreme Court in a dispute over the fairness of the consideration paid to minority shareholders in Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s. In its judgment in case no. 27 Cdo 1678/2025, the Court dismissed the claimants’ appeal and upheld the lower courts’ decisions. KŠB lawyers Radka Felgrová and Vlastimil Pihera represented the company and its majority shareholder.