24.7.2008
News

Recent ECJ Decisions

On 15 March 2007 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) gave judgement in Reemtsma (case C?35/05), a claim for repayment of tax in another Member State under the Eighth Directive (or Section 82 VATA). The ECJ Decision formulated general principles applicable to repayment of tax and hence knowledge of these principles is important both for any Czech tax payer requesting repayment of tax in another Member State, as well for persons liable for tax in another Member State who seek a tax refund in the Czech Republic. The obligations of the tax authority are limited to refunding tax deducted by a supplier under VATA. Refund of tax applied to supplies by mistake, in error or in ignorance by the supplier is inadmissible. Only the supplier is eligible to apply for a tax refund. In exceptional circumstances, if it would be unreasonably difficult or impossible to refund tax to the supplier, Member States nevertheless have a duty to create instruments to allow them to repay tax directly to the recipient of the supply.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.