15.6.2010
News

From Judicature - On 25 February 2010, ref. No. 4 Ads 120/2009-88, the Supreme Administrative Court resolved on an appeal in the matter of the plaintiff Ježek software s.r.o. against the defendant Česká správa sociálního zabezpečení

The Supreme Administrative Court cancelled the challenged judgment and returned the matter to the Regional Court for further proceedings.

The Supreme Administrative Court did not agree with the conclusion of the Regional Court that the term “assessment base of an organization and small organization” could not have been directly deduced from the act itself for the period of 1 January 2007 through 30 June 2007. Act No. 589/1992, Coll., also included organizations and small organizations among payers of social security contributions and set forth an obligation for them to pay insurance contributions that they were obliged to pay on their own behalf. Such payment obligation of such organizations thus could not cease to exist in the decisive period. The amount of the insurance contribution of an organization and a small organization on its own behalf was determined through three quantities, of which Act No. 589/1992, Coll., contained and expressly defined the decisive period and insurance contribution amounts. The term “assessment base of an organization and small organization”, even though not expressly defined, could have been unambiguously deduced from the assessment base of any employee who also was payer of insurance contributions, since only employees could have participated in the social insurance and social security systems in respect of which the insurance contributions were paid; their employers could not have been entitled to receive any performance from such systems (www.nssoud.cz).

The dispute concerning payment of social security contributions for January through June 2007 did not, however, end by the cited resolution. The Regional Court in Liberec recently issued a new judgment in the spirit of Supreme Administrative Court’s legal opinion and the matter will most likely be referred to the Constitutional Court.

Other articles

15.12.2025
News

KŠB Assisted Sandberg Capital with a Majority Investment in HotelTime Solutions

The KŠB team provided legal advice to the investment group Sandberg Capital on the completion of a majority investment in HotelTime Solutions, one of the leading providers of cloud-based software for hotel operations management.

The KŠB team provided legal advice to the investment group Sandberg Capital on the completion of a majority investment in HotelTime Solutions, one of the leading providers of cloud-based software for hotel operations management.

12.12.2025
News

KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.

The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.

The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.

9.12.2025
News

Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?

Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná.

Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.