Amendment to the Code of Distraint Procedure
These costs (i.e. the distrainer’s fees, overheads and other expenses) receive the status of first class receivables when the classification of the distraint estate takes place; this is why they shall be satisfied with priority, i.e. prior to the creditor’s receivable for which the distraint was opened. The change is anchored in the amended second paragraph of Section 68 of the Code of Distraint Procedure (which applies to distraints by sale of movables) or Section 70 (which applies to distraints by sale of a business). The provisions of Section 89 were amended as follows: if the distraint is suspended due to the obliged party’s lack of assets the entitled party shall reimburse the distrainer for both fixed and reasonably spent expenses. Since Act No. 347/2007 Coll. does not contain any transitory provisions, the new provisions shall apply to distraint proceedings commenced prior to the effective date of the amendment.
Other articles
Je stabilita stavebního práva reálným cílem?
Advokátní kancelář KŠB byla odborným garantem diskuse legalwebu s názvem „Stabilita stavebního práva – iluze, nebo reálný cíl?“, která na konci dubna přivedla ke společnému stolu zástupce veřejné správy, developerů, profesních svazů i dalších odborníků ze stavební praxe. Debata se zaměřila na aktuálně projednávané změny nového stavebního zákona (NSZ) a jejich očekávané dopady.
EU261 in the Age of the Hormuz Blockade: How Airlines Can Protect Themselves Before the Crisis Peaks
EU261 in the Age of the Hormuz Blockade: How Airlines Can Protect Themselves Beforethe Crisis Peaks
KŠB advises Olpran in Bikero insolvency proceedings
Kocián Šolc Balaštík has advised bicycle manufacturer Olpran, a notable player in the Czech cycling market, in the insolvency proceedings of Bikero.
