31.7.2003
No items found.

Public shareholdings in privatised companies

Judgements of European Court of Justice in Cases C-98/01 Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and C-463/00 Commission v Kingdom of Spain, Official Journal of the European Union of 5 July 2003, C 158, p. 3 and 4

On 13 May 2003 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued two judgments in which it found United Kingdom and Spanish regulations governing disposal of public shareholdings in privatised companies to be in breach of EC Treaty provisions on the free movement of capital and the freedom of establishment.

Articles of Association of a privatised British airport company in which the government holds a "Special Share" were subject of the ECJ’s assessment in Case C-98/01. Provisions limiting acquisition of voting rights and introducing procedure that makes disposal of the company’s assets, the control of subsidiaries and winding-up of the company subject to consent of the "Special Share" holder were of main concern.

The challenged Spanish legal regulation governs the privatisation of undertakings in the public sector with specified public shareholding. It introduced a system of prior administrative approval relating to (i) voluntary winding up, demerger or merger of the undertaking, (ii) any kind of disposal or charging of the assets or shareholdings necessary for the attainment of the undertaking’s object and which are defined as such, and (iii) change in the undertaking’s object.

ECJ confirmed its established approach that there may be justification for retention by Member States of a degree of influence within undertakings that were initially State held and subsequently privatised, where those undertakings are active in fields involving the provision of services in the public interest or strategic services. Free movement of capital may be restricted only exceptionally, by national rules that are justified by reasons referred to in Article 58 (1) of the EC Treaty or by overriding requirements of the general interest. Under all circumstances, the restrictions must be in full compliance with the principle of proportionality. However, with respect to the above cases, the exception was considered to be either not applicable or not justified.

Other articles

8.8.2025
News

Project Financing of a Strategic Logistics Complex in Nymburk

KŠB provided legal advice to Facility Develop Group in securing two separate financings granted by Trinity Bank. The funds will be used for the development and expansion of a large logistics park in Nymburk, which is of key importance to the infrastructure of the entire Central Bohemian Region.
5.8.2025
News

Legal Advisory to Japanese Group Ushio on the Acquisition of a Division of ams-OSRAM

The KŠB team, led by partner Dagmar Dubecká and attorney Jana Guričová, provided legal advisory to Japanese company Ushio Inc., a global leader in semiconductor technologies and specialized lighting for the automotive and industrial sectors, in connection with its acquisition of the Entertainment& Industrial Lamps segment from the Austrian-based ams-OSRAM Group, a company with over a century of history.
28.7.2025
News

Smetanova Litomyšl Comes to a Close with Music and a Message of Solidarity

This year’s edition of the Smetanova Litomyšl festival concluded with the concert Grand Finale – An American Story, held under the patronage of our firm. In addition to delivering a remarkable musical experience, the evening also served a charitable purpose: proceeds supported the Olga Havel Foundation (Výbor dobré vůle – Nadace Olgy Havlové), helping young people from disadvantaged backgrounds pursue their education.