Public shareholdings in privatised companies
On 13 May 2003 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued two judgments in which it found United Kingdom and Spanish regulations governing disposal of public shareholdings in privatised companies to be in breach of EC Treaty provisions on the free movement of capital and the freedom of establishment.
Articles of Association of a privatised British airport company in which the government holds a "Special Share" were subject of the ECJ’s assessment in Case C-98/01. Provisions limiting acquisition of voting rights and introducing procedure that makes disposal of the company’s assets, the control of subsidiaries and winding-up of the company subject to consent of the "Special Share" holder were of main concern.
The challenged Spanish legal regulation governs the privatisation of undertakings in the public sector with specified public shareholding. It introduced a system of prior administrative approval relating to (i) voluntary winding up, demerger or merger of the undertaking, (ii) any kind of disposal or charging of the assets or shareholdings necessary for the attainment of the undertaking’s object and which are defined as such, and (iii) change in the undertaking’s object.
ECJ confirmed its established approach that there may be justification for retention by Member States of a degree of influence within undertakings that were initially State held and subsequently privatised, where those undertakings are active in fields involving the provision of services in the public interest or strategic services. Free movement of capital may be restricted only exceptionally, by national rules that are justified by reasons referred to in Article 58 (1) of the EC Treaty or by overriding requirements of the general interest. Under all circumstances, the restrictions must be in full compliance with the principle of proportionality. However, with respect to the above cases, the exception was considered to be either not applicable or not justified.
Other articles
KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.
The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.
30th Advent Concert for the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation
This year again, during the pre-Christmas season, the Advent Concert of Good Will took place. Since 1995, it has been organised by the law firm Kocián Šolc Balaštík in support of the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation. This was already the 30th anniversary edition, made exceptional by the fact that we organised it for the first time together with our partner, Smetanova Litomyšl, as part of a broader mutual cooperation. As always, the concert was held in the concert hall of the Church of Sts. Simon and Jude in Prague’s Old Town.
