31.7.2003
No items found.

Public shareholdings in privatised companies

Judgements of European Court of Justice in Cases C-98/01 Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and C-463/00 Commission v Kingdom of Spain, Official Journal of the European Union of 5 July 2003, C 158, p. 3 and 4

On 13 May 2003 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued two judgments in which it found United Kingdom and Spanish regulations governing disposal of public shareholdings in privatised companies to be in breach of EC Treaty provisions on the free movement of capital and the freedom of establishment.

Articles of Association of a privatised British airport company in which the government holds a "Special Share" were subject of the ECJ’s assessment in Case C-98/01. Provisions limiting acquisition of voting rights and introducing procedure that makes disposal of the company’s assets, the control of subsidiaries and winding-up of the company subject to consent of the "Special Share" holder were of main concern.

The challenged Spanish legal regulation governs the privatisation of undertakings in the public sector with specified public shareholding. It introduced a system of prior administrative approval relating to (i) voluntary winding up, demerger or merger of the undertaking, (ii) any kind of disposal or charging of the assets or shareholdings necessary for the attainment of the undertaking’s object and which are defined as such, and (iii) change in the undertaking’s object.

ECJ confirmed its established approach that there may be justification for retention by Member States of a degree of influence within undertakings that were initially State held and subsequently privatised, where those undertakings are active in fields involving the provision of services in the public interest or strategic services. Free movement of capital may be restricted only exceptionally, by national rules that are justified by reasons referred to in Article 58 (1) of the EC Treaty or by overriding requirements of the general interest. Under all circumstances, the restrictions must be in full compliance with the principle of proportionality. However, with respect to the above cases, the exception was considered to be either not applicable or not justified.

Other articles

20.6.2025
News

KŠB advised the seller on the sale of mcePharma to the Brenntag Group

The KŠB team, consisting of Vlastimil Pihera, Jakub Porod, and Dominika Bazalová, provided legal advice to the seller, Mr. Ivan Mikeš, in connection with the sale of 100% of the shares in mcePharma to the international Brenntag Group, a global leader in the distribution of chemicals and ingredients.
18.6.2025
News

KŠB Provided Legal Advisory in the Sale of ARETE Park Rokycany II to the REICO LONG LEASE Fund

Jiří Horník, Jakub Porod, and Yelizaveta Volodina assisted the ARETE group in the sale of the premium logistics complex ARETE Park Rokycany II. The buyer is the REICO LONG LEASE fund, managed by REICO Erste Asset Management. The fund primarily invests in logistics, industrial, retail, office, and other commercial properties, mainly in the Central European region.
17.6.2025
News

KŠB and Smetanova Litomyšl – a partnership with impact

Last weekend, as partners of the Smetanova Litomyšl festival, we had the honour of attending the opening concert of the festival’s 67th edition, featuring the Czech Philharmonic conducted by Jakub Hrůša and the exceptional Norwegian violinist Vilde Frang.