Controversial resolution of the Supreme Court

The subject of the credit agreement is expressly “financial means” whereas the subject of the loan agreement is “items determined pursuant to the type, in particular money”. Pursuant to the resolution of the Supreme Court, funds may be provided, for example, in cash, by transfer to an account or by payment of invoices to the debtor’s creditors, whereas money must be taken over by the debtor in cash. When adopting this interpretation, it would thus not be possible to provide a loan by interbank transfer of funds to an account, since such transfer would mean that a credit is provided.
Other articles
KŠB on Legalweb: Ivo Průša, Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš on creativity, stability and innovation in KŠB
Kocián Šolc Balaštík has been featured in a recent in-depth interview published by Legalweb, with contributions from partner Ivo Průša and counsels Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš. The interview offers insight into the firm’s core values and its direction in an evolving legal market.
Digital Services Act Back in Spotlight
Do you know what Wikipedia and Pornhub have in common? That's right, both are large online platforms designated by the Commission under the Digital Services Act (along with Booking.com, Google Maps, TikTok, Zalando, WhatsApp, and others). The list of very large online platforms and very large search engines, as defined in Article 33(4) of European Regulation 2022/2065 on digital services, was published in the Official Journal of the EU on March 11, 2026.
Kateřina Štěpánková k flexinovele zákoníku práce v anketě Legalwebu
Advokátka KŠB Kateřina Štěpánková poskytla rozhovor odbornému portálu Legalweb v rámci ankety věnované zkušenostem s tzv. flexinovelou zákoníku práce. Ta přinesla od roku 2025 řadu významných změn v pracovněprávních vztazích, například úpravu běhu výpovědní doby nebo prodloužení maximální délky zkušební doby.