Uniform rules for airport charges

Any differences in airport charges will have to be documented by clear and objective criteria. Independent supervisory authorities of individual EU member states will ensure the inspection for compliance with the rules. The proposed directive thus intends to strengthen not only equal conditions between service operators but also contribute to the protection of consumers.
The European Parliament, however, increased the limit for application of the directive by five times compared to the original proposal of the Commission - the limit being the number of passengers served at a concrete airport and increasing it from one million to five million per year. Simultaneously, the unified system shall be applied to the largest airport in each EU member state regardless of the number of passengers.
The deputies also agreed with allowing incentives for opening new routes to the most distant or otherwise disadvantageous destinations.
Further amending proposals arising from the second reading, which took place in late October 2008, concern the prefinancing of investments in airports, interconnection thereof with the policy of the International Civil Aviation Organization and the necessary protective measures.
The Council, however, committed itself in advance to adopt Parliament’s amending proposals so that the final wording of the new directive should not be changed.
Other articles
KŠB Assisted Sandberg Capital with a Majority Investment in HotelTime Solutions
The KŠB team provided legal advice to the investment group Sandberg Capital on the completion of a majority investment in HotelTime Solutions, one of the leading providers of cloud-based software for hotel operations management.
KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.
The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.