Abuse of dominant position

First, Intel granted concealed discounts and even made direct payments to computer manufacturers who undertook to purchase microprocessors from Intel on an exclusive basis (as an example, the Commission cited Media Saturn Holding, one of the leaders in the sale of electronic devices, which Intel directly paid to not sell computers with microprocessors other than Intel’s). The Commission stated that these payments and discounts prevented consumers from freely choosing alternative products other than those offered by the company with a dominant position on the market.
Second, Intel was found to have violated its dominant position by directly or indirectly paying computer manufacturers to suspend or delay market launches of products that would contain processors other than Intel’s. The Commission stated that Intel’s violation constituted a severe breach of free competition and innovation in the computer microprocessor industry.
Other articles
KŠB Confirms Its Position in the Chambers Global Guide 2026
In the latest edition of the prestigious Chambers Global Guide 2026, KŠB once again reaffirms its strong position among the leading law firms on the Czech market. Recognition across all four ranked practice areas confirms the stability of our teams and the long-term trust of our clients.
KŠB na společném fóru soudců a advokátů
Dne 12. února 2026 se v Brně uskutečnil 2. ročník společného setkání zástupců ze soudnictví a advokacie pod záštitou České advokátní komory a Nejvyššího správního soudu. Naši advokátní kancelář na tomto významném fóru zastupovali Petra Mirovská a Jakub Mehl.
KŠB Advises J&T Banka, UniCredit and PPF banka on the Next Phase of EMMA Capital’s Bond Programme
KŠB has continued its legal advisory role in connection with investment group EMMA Capital’s bond programme, which has been generating sustained and strong investor interest.