26.2.2005
News

Individual dividend taxation in context of free movement of capital

Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Manninen (C-319/02) of 7 September 2004

The case involved a Finnish tax resident who held shares in a Swedish company and received dividends in that regard.

Under Finnish tax legislation, both Finnish corporations and their Finnish shareholders were subject to income tax on profits when, respectively, acquired by a company or further received by a shareholder in the form of dividends.

To mitigate that double corporate and individual taxation, Finnish laws provided individual shareholders with Finnish tax residence with a specific tax credit. That benefit, however, was only available for domestic dividends. As a result, Finnish residents receiving dividends from companies from other Member States were not allowed to claim the credit at issue, thus being potentially harmed by double taxation.

In the present case, the claimant was refused credit for dividends from a Swedish company. The national court examining his claims decided to refer the issue to the European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”).

The ECJ observed that Finnish tax rules were likely to impede collection of capital by companies from other Member States from Finnish individual investors and discouraged the latter from investments in foreign shareholdings. Therefore, Finnish tax legislation was in breach of the Treaty principle of free movement of capital.

The ECJ further held that such restrictive national measures may not be upheld even if their abolishment was to result in diminution of tax revenues of the Member State granting the tax credit. The ECJ also rejected the argument that the extension of the credit to foreign dividends runs counter to the coherence of the Finish tax system.

Consequently, the ECJ ruled that individual investors should enjoy the benefit of a shareholding tax credit both for domestic and for foreign dividends, received from companies established in other EU Member States.

The judgment of the ECJ follows a series of its recent decisions which seek to abolish fiscal impediments faced by EU citizens making investments in other Member States, based on the free movement of capital contained in the EC Treaty.

Other articles

19.3.2026
News

KŠB on Legalweb: Ivo Průša, Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš on creativity, stability and innovation in KŠB

Advokátní kancelář Kocián Šolc Balaštík byla představena v rozsáhlém rozhovoru na odborném portálu Legalweb, na kterém se podíleli partner Ivo Průša a counselové Jana Guričová a Ján Béreš. Rozhovor nabízí pohled na hodnoty, na nichž KŠB dlouhodobě stojí, i na další směřování kanceláře v kontextu měnícího se právního trhu.

Kocián Šolc Balaštík has been featured in a recent in-depth interview published by Legalweb, with contributions from partner Ivo Průša and counsels Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš. The interview offers insight into the firm’s core values and its direction in an evolving legal market.

11.3.2026
News

Digital Services Act Back in Spotlight

Do you know what Wikipedia and Pornhub have in common? That's right, both are large online platforms designated by the Commission under the Digital Services Act (along with Booking.com, Google Maps, TikTok, Zalando, WhatsApp, and others). The list of very large online platforms and very large search engines, as defined in Article 33(4) of European Regulation 2022/2065 on digital services, was published in the Official Journal of the EU on March 11, 2026.

Do you know what Wikipedia and Pornhub have in common? That's right, both are large online platforms designated by the Commission under the Digital Services Act (along with Booking.com, Google Maps, TikTok, Zalando, WhatsApp, and others). The list of very large online platforms and very large search engines, as defined in Article 33(4) of European Regulation 2022/2065 on digital services, was published in the Official Journal of the EU on March 11, 2026.

4.3.2026
News

Kateřina Štěpánková k flexinovele zákoníku práce v anketě Legalwebu

Advokátka KŠB Kateřina Štěpánková poskytla rozhovor odbornému portálu Legalweb v rámci ankety věnované zkušenostem s tzv. flexinovelou zákoníku práce. Ta přinesla od roku 2025 řadu významných změn v pracovněprávních vztazích, například úpravu běhu výpovědní doby nebo prodloužení maximální délky zkušební doby.

Advokátka KŠB Kateřina Štěpánková poskytla rozhovor odbornému portálu Legalweb v rámci ankety věnované zkušenostem s tzv. flexinovelou zákoníku práce. Ta přinesla od roku 2025 řadu významných změn v pracovněprávních vztazích, například úpravu běhu výpovědní doby nebo prodloužení maximální délky zkušební doby.