Failure to duly notify of intent to take over the company

The Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes said in this connection that the breach of the obligations arising from the above Regulation should be regarded as a very serious breach of competition rules.
This case is particularly worrying because, in the view of the Commission, the merger did not even cause infringement of free competition, and the company was fined for failure to notify its intention the Commission in time. In fact, Electrabel informed the Commission of its intention to take over the company CNR on 26 March 2008. On 29 April 2008, Commission gave its consent, together with the finding that a significant infringement of free competition in the market would not occur by this merger.
However the Commission left the question open on when the takeover of CNR had in fact occurred. An investigation later found that the takeover had taken place in December 2003 and that it had been more than 4 years before the Commission was informed of the intention to take over. At the end of 2003, the company Electrabel bought nearly 50% of the shares and thus became the largest shareholder of the company; in the view of the Commission, Electrabel took effective control of CNR because the remaining shares were widely dispersed and the participation of their owners at general meetings - and thus their percentage of participation in decision-making in CNR – were low.
The Commission stated in respect of the large amount of the fine that the company Electrabel is a major multinational corporation that has a lot of experiences with the mergers and therefore should have been aware that the merger, which occurred in 2003, would result in the assumption of control over CNR, which required prior notification in accordance with the Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings.
Other articles
KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting
The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.
DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service
Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.
KŠB Advised J&T IB and Capital Markets on the 3M FUND MSI SICAV Bond Program
Kocián Šolc Balaštík provided legal advice to J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. as the arranger in preparing the base prospectus for 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.’s bond program.