Failure to duly notify of intent to take over the company

The Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes said in this connection that the breach of the obligations arising from the above Regulation should be regarded as a very serious breach of competition rules.
This case is particularly worrying because, in the view of the Commission, the merger did not even cause infringement of free competition, and the company was fined for failure to notify its intention the Commission in time. In fact, Electrabel informed the Commission of its intention to take over the company CNR on 26 March 2008. On 29 April 2008, Commission gave its consent, together with the finding that a significant infringement of free competition in the market would not occur by this merger.
However the Commission left the question open on when the takeover of CNR had in fact occurred. An investigation later found that the takeover had taken place in December 2003 and that it had been more than 4 years before the Commission was informed of the intention to take over. At the end of 2003, the company Electrabel bought nearly 50% of the shares and thus became the largest shareholder of the company; in the view of the Commission, Electrabel took effective control of CNR because the remaining shares were widely dispersed and the participation of their owners at general meetings - and thus their percentage of participation in decision-making in CNR – were low.
The Commission stated in respect of the large amount of the fine that the company Electrabel is a major multinational corporation that has a lot of experiences with the mergers and therefore should have been aware that the merger, which occurred in 2003, would result in the assumption of control over CNR, which required prior notification in accordance with the Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings.
Other articles
KŠB Assisted Sandberg Capital with a Majority Investment in HotelTime Solutions
The KŠB team provided legal advice to the investment group Sandberg Capital on the completion of a majority investment in HotelTime Solutions, one of the leading providers of cloud-based software for hotel operations management.
KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.
The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.