25.7.2008
News

Motor insurance for all passengers (new decision of the ECJ)

The ECJ ruled that the Third Motor Insurance Directive (Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles) requires all passengers to be covered by motor insurance and therefore Irish national legislation, which precludes those not travelling in a part of a vehicle designed to carry passengers, is incompatible with Community law.

Article 1 of the Third Motor Insurance Directive is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation whereby compulsory motor vehicle liability insurance does not cover liability in respect of personal injuries to persons travelling in a part of a motor vehicle that has not been designed and constructed with seating accommodation for passengers. Further Article 1 of the Third Motor Insurance Directive satisfies all the conditions necessary for it to produce direct effect and accordingly confers rights upon which individuals may rely directly before the national courts.

Other articles

28.5.2026
Capital markets

KŠB radila J&T IB and Capital Markets při dluhopisovém programu 3M FUND MSI SICAV

Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.

Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.

26.5.2026
News

Shortlist Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026

KŠB and partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.

KŠBand partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.

25.5.2026
Disputes

KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders

The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.

The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.