Petr Kasík and Vlastimil Pihera comment on Constitutional Court’s ruling on squeeze-outs in Lidové noviny
They draw attention to the inconsistent justification of the cited award, which does not clearly state whether, according to the court, the absence of supervision or other defects in legal regulations constitute grounds for the conflict with the Constitution, even though only the second of the stated options would be the logical answer. They hypothesize that historical resolutions on squeeze-out must be assessed always in relation to concrete circumstances and examine whether the not-very successful legal regulation was abused in the case in question, but there was not enough space for condemnation thereof en bloc.
By way of conclusion, they state that the existing regulation of squeeze-outs, despite the absence of the Czech National Bank’s supervision, appears to conform with the Constitution with regard to the concept of the commented resolution of the Constitution Court. The whole article can be downloaded here (in Czech only)
Other articles
KŠB at EMUN’s Investment Outlook 2026 Conference in Prague
Kocián Šolc Balaštík (KŠB) continues its active cooperation with key partners in the investment and financial sectors, most recently as a partner of EMUN’s Investment Outlook 2026 conference.
KŠB advises the National Development Bank on the integration of the Czech Export Bank
KŠB advised the National Development Bank (Národní rozvojová banka, a.s.) on the integration of the Czech Export Bank (Česká exportní banka, a.s.) into the NRB group.
When Excessive Prevention Does More Harm Than Good
At the end of 2025, the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic ruled that the preventive retention of traffic and location data under the Electronic Communications Act infringes the rights of the persons whose data is concerned.
