European Court of Justice declares itself not competent when the reference for a preliminary ruling
A Hungarian court asked the European Court of Justice (hereinafter the “ECJ”) to interpret the provisions of an EU Directive in the context of a dispute on a transaction that took place in 2002 (i.e. before accession on 1st May 2004). The Hungarian court also asked for confirmation that the ECJ was competent given the relevant date.
The ECJ decided that it was not competent to interpret EU law in the context of a dispute regarding facts that took place before the date of accession to the EU.
First of all, this decision only relates to the possibility for a Czech/Polish/Slovak court (or another national court) to refer to the ECJ for the purpose of interpreting EU law. The decision therefore means à contrario that if the relevant events took place on or after 1st May 2004, or if the case concerns a situation which continues after that date, Czech/Polish/Slovak courts can ask the ECJ for its interpretation on the relevant EU rules.
Secondly, however, it is important to stress that the above decision does not restrict the use of EU rules and case law in proceedings before a Czech/Polish/Slovak courts (regardless of the date of the facts of the dispute). Such reference may for instance be relevant for clarifying existing ECJ case law or other parts of EU law. In other words, the fact that the ECJ may not have jurisdiction does not prevent from making arguments on the basis of EU law.
Other articles
KŠB Assisted Sandberg Capital with a Majority Investment in HotelTime Solutions
The KŠB team provided legal advice to the investment group Sandberg Capital on the completion of a majority investment in HotelTime Solutions, one of the leading providers of cloud-based software for hotel operations management.
KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.
The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.
