10.11.2021
•
News
Real estate and construction
KSB Advises ARETE on Closing Its Real Estate Sub-Fund
The ARETE investment and real estate group, which includes funds that invest in real estate, has successfully closed the investment cycle of its ARETE INVEST CEE II sub-fund. Following the EUR 113.2 million sale of the sub-fund's portfolio to Cromwell European REIT (CEREIT) in March (KSB advised ARETE on the transaction as well), the company has paid all investors in the sub-fund and settled the bank financing liabilities.

This is the second successful closing of a sub-fund within the ARETE Group.
KSB advised the founders of the ARETE Group on, among other things, issues related to dissolving the sub-fund and settling its liabilities.
"I would like to thank KSB's team for their exemplary advice and professionalism throughout the entire life of ARETE INVEST CEE II, its sale and successful closing," added Lubor Svoboda, co-founder of ARETE Group.
For more information, please read ARETE's press release here.
Other articles
7.2.2025
•
News
Our Lawyers at the "Lawyers and Judges Through Each Other’s Eyes" Meeting
On February 6, 2025, our lawyers Radka Felgrová, Petra Mirovská, and Vlastimil Pihera participated in a gathering at the Supreme Administrative Court in Brno, where they joined other lawyers and judges from the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, and Supreme Administrative Court to discuss the topic "Lawyers and Judges Through Each Other’s Eyes."
30.1.2025
•
News
Advising OAMP Holding on the Purchase of Land in the Mošnov Industrial Zone
The KŠB team provided legal advice to OAMP Holding, jointly owned by CONCENS INVESTMENTS and Colorizo Investment, on the purchase of 513,000 m² of land in the strategic Mošnov Industrial Zone (Ostrava Airport Multimodal Park).
17.1.2025
•
News
A Historic Success After Twenty Years: Unlawful State Decision Confirmed
AThe team, consisting of Tomáš Sequens and Petra Mirovská, achieved a significant victory in a complex legal dispute over compensation for damages against the state after a long twenty years of legal battles. The case concerned an unlawful decision and administrative misconduct by the Ministry of the Environment during a licensing procedure conducted in 2005.