14.7.2022
News
Real estate and construction
Intellectual property

KSB advises architecture firm William Matthews Associates

KSB's team (Václav Rovenský, Dana Jacková and Tomáš Trávníček) is advising British architecture firm William Matthews Associates (WMA), which won the international design competition for the new headquarters of Správa Železnic (National Railway Administration - NRA) in Prague.

The building will house the NRA’s entire organisation, which includes several thousand employees who currently occupy a number of buildings in Prague and elsewhere. The aim is to create a modern work environment for NRA staff that is strategically located in the expanding centre of Prague.

KSB’s assistance has consisted mainly in negotiating the terms of the contract for the architectural study and the design documentation and in supporting WMA throughout the contract negotiation process for the project itself.

More information about the project can be found here.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.