Information on an amendment to Act on Collective Investment
So-called black collective investment
The legal regulation of collective investment was based on the fact the Collective Investment Act, similar to its predecessor, the Act on Investment Funds and Investment Companies, exclusively regulated the activities of investment funds and investment companies. The new amendment brings fundamental changes in this respect.
The act newly prohibits any activities consisting of collecting funds from the public for the purpose of joint investment thereof, unless this happens on the basis of a special public-legal permit, such as a permit for activities of investment funds or investment companies or, as the case may be, a permit for activities of banks, insurance companies or pension funds. The act however states that public offerings of securities under the conditions set forth by the Capital Market Trading Act do not constitute a breach of such prohibition. This regulation gives rise to many ambiguities. Primarily, it is not clear what is to be understood under the term “public” and to which entities the prohibition applies. These questions are particularly relevant for private risk capital funds, various real estate unions, German type funds and construction cooperatives.
2. Real estate funds
The existing legal regulation regulated funds investing in real estate or what is termed real estate companies, but it set the lowest investment of a single investor in such fund to be CZK 2 million. Therefore these funds could not be used for retail clients.
The amendment brings a fundamental change that on the one hand removes the requirement for the minimum amount of the investment and thus enables this type of investment to be offered to a broader circle of investors, which from the economic viewpoint implies a fundamental change for the real estate market. On the other hand, the amendment makes the rules for investing in these type of funds significantly stricter. It regulates real estate companies in detail, in particular the so-called expert committee whose task is to valuate real estate held by a fund, and it newly stipulates certain investment limits. In connection with the requirements of practical life, the new regulation gives rise to questions concerning the possibilities of the funds’ participation in development projects, in particular the possibility of acquiring real estate companies, credit financing of construction and risks arising therefrom.
3. Funds of qualified investors
So-called funds of qualified investors introduced by the amendment are a novelty in the field of collective investment. Only financial institutions and persons who sign a declaration stating they have experience with securities trading can invest in these funds. The minimum investment per investor amounts to CZK 1 million. These funds can have a single investor, but not more than one hundred investors.
The act does not stipulate any investment restrictions or limits for the funds of qualified investors. However it allows them tax advantages of collective investment funds (5% tax), thanks to which the qualified investors funds will most likely be used in all areas of business, in particular as risk capital funds or by developers or real estate administrators. In this respect, questions emerge concerning the extent of admissible investments of the funds such as, for example, whether the fund may invest in a production enterprise or whether such fund can be a real estate company.
Other articles
KŠB assisted Seyfor with the extension of its financing provided by Raiffeisenbank, Tatra banka and, newly, Slovenská sporiteľňa.
The KŠB team provided legal advice to its long-standing client Seyfor in connection with the continuation and expansion of its syndicated financing. The existing lending banks, Raiffeisenbank Czech Republic and Tatra banka, decided to continue supporting Seyfor’s growth, with Slovenská sporiteľňa joining the financing as a new lender.
Evidence skutečných majitelů: Co přinese znepřístupnění od 17. prosince 2025?
Letošní rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu a Nejvyššího správního soudu navázala na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropské unie, a, s platností i pro Českou republiku, konstatovala, že zveřejňování údajů v rámci evidence skutečných majitelů představuje nepřiměřený zásah do základních práv majitelů na soukromí a ochranu osobních údajů. Důležitým aspektem těchto rozhodnutí byl závěr, že sankce, které postihují povinné subjekty jako reakce na nesplnění jejich povinnosti zápisu do evidence skutečných majitelů, není možné vymáhat, dokud je evidence veřejná. Tato situace se změní 17. prosince 2025, kdy ministerstvo znepřístupní evidenci skutečných majitelů; povinným subjektům tak budou opět hrozit závažné sankce.
30th Advent Concert for the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation
This year again, during the pre-Christmas season, the Advent Concert of Good Will took place. Since 1995, it has been organised by the law firm Kocián Šolc Balaštík in support of the Committee of Good Will – Olga Havlová Foundation. This was already the 30th anniversary edition, made exceptional by the fact that we organised it for the first time together with our partner, Smetanova Litomyšl, as part of a broader mutual cooperation. As always, the concert was held in the concert hall of the Church of Sts. Simon and Jude in Prague’s Old Town.
