14.6.2017
News

KŠB Associate Martina Parusová-Zímová Contributes to New Franchising Handbook

Martina Parusová-Zímová is the co-author of the 2nd Edition of the International Franchise Handbook, published by DWF Germany Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, in which she wrote a section on Czech franchising legislation and regulation.

In writing the Czech section, Martina - who has been a franchising-specialized attorney for over eight years - employed both her knowledge and experience with advising clients and her long-term involvement in the Czech Franchising Association’s management board.

Other articles

28.5.2026
Capital markets

KŠB radila J&T IB and Capital Markets při dluhopisovém programu 3M FUND MSI SICAV

Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.

Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.

26.5.2026
News

Shortlist Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026

KŠB and partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.

KŠBand partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.

25.5.2026
Disputes

KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders

The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.

The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.