28.8.2023
News
Private wealth, tusts, foundations

KSB Advises on Establishing Tišina Endowment Fund

Vlastimil Pihera and Sabina Prokopová assisted in establishing and incorporating the Tišina Endowment Fund. The founders – Ivana Štefková, Barbora Dvořáková and Markéta Trubačová – aim to provide a platform for people who have experienced a significant upheaval in their lives and also for artists and creators who, for various reasons, cannot devote themselves to their work.

Our assistance consisted mainly in drafting the fund’s incorporation document, in which the founders expressed their intentions and ideas about how the fund should operate and fulfil its purpose.

We are proud that our team's specific expertise, particularly in matters relating to foundations and other non-profit entities in the cultural, charitable, and healthcare sectors, helped to create optimal conditions for achieving the goals of yet another client in this sector.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.